“Unfortunately, recently, many of our lawyers complain that their petitions remain without consideration, reject without any justification. It is not an exception and the fact that these petitions are aimed at comprehensive, full and objective Investigation of all circumstances related to criminal prosecution, within the framework of the necessary legal procedure, to restore the violated rights and legitimate interests of the participants in the criminal process. ” About this on its page in the social network Facebook Posted by Chairman of the Board of Lawyers Anar Bagirov.
Anar Bagirov reminded that lawyers are a subject of evidence and promote the full, comprehensive and objective implementation of a trial by participating in the collection, verification and evaluation of evidence. One of the most important forms of the participation of a lawyer in proof, both in the pre-trial investigation and in the trial, is the filing of the petitions.
“I want to note that these circumstances are under threat of reforms carried out in our republic in the direction of improving the efficiency and quality of justice, and suggest a shadow on the work in this direction,” Anar Bagirov said.
Listing the relevant articles of the Criminal Procedure Code, Anar Bashirov noted that the petitions aimed at a comprehensive, complete and objective investigation of all circumstances related to criminal prosecution may not be rejected to the restoration of the violated rights and legitimate interests of the participants in the criminal process and other persons participating in criminal proceedings.
“Our legislation obliges to consider each application of the participants in the criminal proceedings with their entertainment in the Protocol. To accurately investigate and, in case of refusal, to substantiate, take a motivated decision on the petition.
I believe that the above requirements of legislation should be strictly observed by all the courts. No application should be rejected without sufficient substantiation and indication of the cause. Because such circumstances not only negatively affect the quality and effectiveness of justice, but also reduce the trust of our citizens to the court, “Anar Bagirov said.