In the Baku Court in grave crimes, the criminal proceedings continued in relation to the former head of the Farhad Milazade Foreign Affairs of Mollazade and the Consular Office of the Ministry of Salim Alizade, reports haqqin.az
The lawyer of the accused Farhad Mlasada Kyandar Nasibov, who spent on the process chaired by the judge of Afghan Hajiyev, said that the damage in a criminal case in the amount of 2 and a half million manat was reimbursed by his client, and also noted that Farhad Mlasada did not spend illegally received money on yourself.
“Farhad Mlasade noted in his testimony that the amount recorded as waste was spent on economic work and other expenses. That is, this money was spent on their intended purpose. My client, by the way, there is no personal car, nor personal At home. He had a property that remained from his father, which he sold to compensate the damage, “said the lawyer.
When making a sentence, Kyandar Nasibov asked the court to take into account that his prostication during the trial gave confessions, did not prevent the course of the investigation and reimbursed the damage caused.
Then accepted the lawyer of another accused Salim Alizade and asked to apply to the prostrate punishment, not providing for imprisonment:
“Salim Alizade was the performer, he was given specific instructions, and he fulfilled instructions. Now for all these two answers.”
Speaking at the trial with the last word, Farhad Mlasade said that he regretted his own: “I fully agree with what Kamdar Nasibov said. I also sorry about the deed. Believe me, I have already punished myself. I ask you, taking Solution, go to my position. “
The accused Selim Alizade asked the trial for the last word.
According to charges, F. Malllazade, being in collusion with S. Alisade and other persons, with the aim of acquiring for the Ministry of Gifts, Stationery, Souvenirs, etc. Through various firms, as a whole assigned 2 million 543 thousand 173 manat. The assignment of funds was carried out by fictitious announcement of the winner of tenders. The accused were detained as a result of an operation conducted by the State Security Service. They were charged under articles 179.4 (appropriation in particularly large amount) and 308 (abuse of official powers) of the Criminal Code. With regard to these persons, the Sabail district court elected a preventive measure in the form of detention, but after a while she was changed to home arrest.