IMF Executive Board Concludes 2021 Article IV Consultation with Mauritius

Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded the Article IV consultation[1]with Mauritius.

While the pandemic has hit the Mauritian economy hard, the authorities have been successful in containing the virus and mitigating the economic impact of the crisis. With tourism halted, real GDP contracted by 15 percent in 2020, and the current account deficit widened substantially. However, unemployment—while high—was contained by wage support schemes. In the face of falling revenue and urgent social spending needs, the fiscal deficit has widened notably. Inflation is low, while the banking and global business sectors appear to be sound. From the outset of the pandemic, the rapid closure of the border, imposition of a lockdown, and other public health measures have kept viral transmission to a low level. Vaccinations began in February 2021, and the authorities target vaccinating 60 percent of the population by end-September 2021.

The economy will begin to recover in 2021, with growth forecast at about 5 percent. Tourism flows are expected to slowly resume in the second half of the year, and exports will strengthen in line with global demand. Unemployment will likely remain elevated as wage support schemes are scaled back but then return to trend in the following years. Inflation is projected to increase modestly by end-2021, propelled by recuperating aggregate demand. Medium-term growth is projected to converge to pre-pandemic rates of 3-3½ percent. Mauritius’ economic outlook is subject to downside risks as the country emerges from the pandemic. Tourism flows are uncertain, and a prolonged pandemic could require costly containment efforts and prompt behavioral changes hurting tourism.

Executive Board Assessment[2]

Executive Directors agreed with the thrust of the staff appraisal. Directors congratulated Mauritius for its success in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. They noted that the pandemic has severely impacted Mauritius’ economy, resulting in substantially widened fiscal and current account deficits. Directors cautioned that challenges and risks remain, particularly the unclear pace of recovery in tourism, complicating the authorities’ decisions on when to scale back emergency measures. They encouraged the authorities to take advantage of the recovery to institute broad-based structural reforms toward a more resilient, green, and inclusive economy, while addressing debt sustainability concerns and strengthening the monetary policy framework.

Directors agreed that the fiscal stance should remain accommodative in the near term. However, given the rising debt level, the authorities should prepare for credible medium-term consolidation and rebuilding fiscal buffers, including through an appropriate fiscal rule. Once the country has exited the crisis, revenue will need to be increased and spending reduced to put debt on a declining path, while avoiding undue social costs. Directors stressed that a successful adjustment requires addressing the growing divergence between pension spending and revenue, particularly given the unfavorable demographic situation.

Directors concurred that monetary policy should remain accommodative in the near term, while preparing for the normalization of monetary and exchange rate policies. In this context, they encouraged enhancing the central bank’s credibility, as well as improving monetary policy transmission and effectiveness. Directors stressed that the central bank should refrain from providing direct financing to the government and engaging in quasi-fiscal activities, and advised reforming the Bank of Mauritius law, including to preempt further exceptional transfers to the government. Directors also recommended that the central bank be recapitalized and relinquish ownership of the Mauritius Investment Corporation (MIC), with the financing of the MIC provided through the budgetary process.

Directors noted that, while subject to elevated uncertainty, Mauritius’ external position at end-2020 was substantially weaker than is consistent with medium-term fundamentals and desirable policies, while official foreign reserves coverage remained within the adequacy range. They stressed that the foreign exchange intervention strategy should be revised to support exchange rate flexibility, while smoothing extreme exchange rate volatility and ensuring market liquidity.

Directors urged the Mauritian authorities to sustain reforms to support its structural transformation to a strong, resilient, and inclusive growth path. They supported the authorities’ commitment to exit the FATF and EU AML/CFT lists, enhance diversification, strengthen competitiveness, improve public sector procurement practices, and mitigate vulnerabilities to climate change.

Mauritius: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2019-2022

2019

2020

2021

2022

National income, prices and employment

Real GDP (percentage change)

3.0

-14.9

5.0

6.7

Consumer prices (period average, percentage change)

0.5

2.5

2.3

3.7

Unemployment rate (percent)

6.7

9.2

9.2

9.2

Money and credit (percentage change)

Net foreign assets

13.5

16.4

-8.7

-0.4

Broad money

6.2

17.7

-1.5

2.5

Central government finances 1 (percent of GDP)

Overall borrowing requirement 2

-13.1

-20.0

-8.4

-5.6

Revenues, including grants

22.7

21.8

23.2

23.9

Expenditure, excluding net lending

34.5

38.4

31.3

29.4

External sector

Current account balance (percent of GDP)

-5.4

-12.6

-15.6

-6.8

Gross international reserves (millions of U.S. dollars)

7,329

7,242

6,192

5,942

Memorandum items:

GDP at current market prices (billions of Mauritian rupees)

498.3

429.4

453.6

498.5

Public sector debt, fiscal year (percent of GDP)

84.6

92.0

92.6

91.4

Sources: Country authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

1 GFSM 2001 concept of net lending/net borrowing, includes special and other extrabudgetary funds. Fiscal data reported for fiscal years (e.g., 2018=2018/19).

2 Following the GFSM 2014, Sections 5.111-5.116, the transfers from the BOM to the Central Government are considered as financing.



[1]Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board.

[2]At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summings up can be found here:https://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.

Public Release. More on this here.