A few days before the appearance of the Sochinsky meeting for Armenia, Pashinyan accused Azerbaijan in the implementation of aggressive policies against Armenia. In addition, the Armenian Prime Minister resorted to the Cylet Metaphor on the jungle laws. Well, let’s start with the fact that the Stoik himself was an anti-colonialist who condemned the policy of his own metropolis in his works and philosophical letters. What you can not say about Pashinyan. Otherwise, the politician could touch the banal truth, a fair question is true – how is the policy that has been implemented by Armenia for Azerbaijan for 30 years? There was no aggression? There was no barbarism and wildness in full accordance with the laws of the jungle? The historical monument of aggressive policy of Armenia is today’s lowland Karabakh. We are revealed in all its glory a visual history of barbarism, or rather vandalism. The deviant behavior of the Armenian on the captured territories is inherent in the vandal.
But back to the political discourse, leaving a moral assessment on the conscience of Pashinyan. To this day, seven villages of the Kazakh district – the sovereign territory of Azerbaijan, as the village of Kerki Nakhchivan Autonomy are under the occupation of Armenia. Is the investigation of aggressive politics to hold the territories of another sovereign state?
In addition, in the developed ruling party, a document on the last exacerbation in the Armenian-Azerbaijani border is openly put forward the thesis on the presence of territorial claims to Azerbaijan. Is this not a continuation of aggressive politics?
Yes, and Pashinyan himself, in his last speech, repeatedly called the territorial-administrative district of Karabakh – the territory belonging to another sovereign state, the geographical toponym of the times of ancient Rome. About 2 thousand years ago, judging by the tendency Armenian historiography, this geographical location was called some artsakh. Neglecting political ethics and measure of the responsibility of the head of government, Pashinyan uses Toponym to our era with respect to Karabakh. Moreover, the head of the Armenian government proclaims that the population of this Ancient Roman province should take advantage of the right to self-determination. In a word, in the rhetoric of Armenian politicians and even Pashinyan has not changed since 1988, who paved the way, as Vladimir Putin repeats, to the greatest geopolitical catastrophe, the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Today, this militant rhetoric can turn into a geopolitical collapse – a new war and regional cataclysms. And all the sake of a delusional dream about the “time machine” of the absolute majority of Armenian politicians calling for the Caucasian region during the time of ancient Rome.
Asks, how is this rhetoric of Pashinyan? Isn’t that aggression? If not aggression, then this is the worst manifestation of collective madness! ..